term: Ontological Commoning
One of the terms used on this wiki.
2025: I have started a separate O namespace with its own index.
I have made two recent attempts to spell out some of the methodology. A more general one is at 2025-03-17; I am now maintaining a concise draft 90-minute exercise along with a separate page on the rationale.
I mean: the process and practice of finding common ground between different perspectives on a complex situation; finding ways to make sense of each other's conceptual models, without erasing differences, but generating a wider perspective within which individual perspectives can be inter-related. In my experience, this enriches the understanding and the models on all sides.
It's good to feel some resonance in what Leo XIV said (2025-05-18). We are aiming “to achieve that unity which does not cancel out differences but values the personal history of each person and the social and religious culture of every people.”
From December 2023, I must highlight the excellent podcast created by Anna-Marie Swan in dialogue with me around ontological commoning. Listening to this will give you a very rich sense of many connected issues.
I chose this term because it had not been used as that precise phrase before I did in early 2023. The initial expression of this idea was at the entry: 2023-02-22. Later in 2023 I found it becoming increasingly relevant and vital.
“Ontological commoning” just my name for the idea, as it's not completely new or original. I see many similarities in other approaches. I choose to use the name to point out that disagreement and conflict often have their roots at an ontological level, and can be addressed there, too.
I set out some ideas on the broader topic of knowledge commoning at 2025-07-27.
related terms, topics, themes
- the topic regenerating relationship
- the topic knowledge commons
- the term ontology, where I briefly explain the two sides to ontology and how I relate them together.
see also
- the late Silke Helfrich on commoning either directly on YouTube or with a transcript on the P2P Foundation wiki.
- research from UC Berkeley why we disagree so often (via Greater Good)
- Adversarial Collaboration I see as closely related.